OK. So this is a brass nipple, not the human nipple I am about to write about. If you want nipple pics, hop over to the Curate after Dark. I hope I haven't unduly excited any plumbers with this picture. Now, onward!
If we take the literal Biblical story of creation as correct, and there are those who do, what was God thinking of when he gave men nipples? He hadn't even considered the possibility of children until Eve did the dirty of their agreement, so what was the point?
Just an ornament to break up the monotony?
And, once Eve was in the bad books and condemned to a life of conception and sorrow, did he have to re-engineer her to have lactating breasts?
If not, why was she given them in the first place?
Adam's pleasure? Maybe. But why lactating?
I really cannot get my head around how some people can believe the these stories are true.
I am eagerly awaiting the next visit of the door-to-door brigade, to quiz them.
...
5 comments:
But Lee - you already know the answer: "God moves in mysterious ways." So bloody mysterious as to be one rib short of a rack.
PS - I think this should be called The Nipple Paradox, or possibly Lee's Nipple Conjecture.
Hang on though, Adam could have had no nips and Eve created with two, with the resultant offspring acquiring Eve's genetic blueprint for nips, which were a necessary modification if Eve were to bear offspring.
Bang goes the theory.
A better question is why Adam was created with testes, which he would definitely have needed to procreate.
Why do they have anything sexual at all? Shouldn't they have been two little blogs sitting in paradise, soaking up the rapture?
Come on, God knew what was going to happen all along; why else be all knowing? Besides, male nipples are pleasure-points for gays. Hmmm, maybe God is Gay? LOL What a bunch of sh*t! It's all about power.
Post a Comment